<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>hna pwns... spadam = /b/tard</title><link>http://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/feed/rss2/posts/"/><description></description><language>en-EU</language><generator>MokoFeed</generator><ttl>10</ttl><item><title>Sam</title><link>http://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/2008/09/08/sam-4696189/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:hannahborrett.blog.co.uk,2008-09-07:/2008/09/08/sam-4696189/</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:07:17 +0200</pubDate><description>	&lt;p&gt;Let's make it ambiguous as to which one.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Today, it was revealed that Sam is like, Prince of the Geeks. Except his gaming and general internet ignorance betray him and he'll therefore probably never be King. /b/ moar sauce! And he's also seen a female in real life that isn't his mother, so he's already way cooler than most of his geekbrothers. And he's been out of his room recently. He's also better groomed. &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;BUT a "geek" he still is, and I have a new found respect for him after his recent geekhabit sharing and love him for it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/2008/09/08/sam-4696189/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><category>sam</category><category>blah</category><category>geek</category><comments>http://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/2008/09/08/sam-4696189/#comments</comments></item><item><title>Repeating... repeating... repeating...</title><link>http://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/2007/05/20/repeating_repeating_repeating~2304588/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:hannahborrett.blog.co.uk,2007-05-20:/2007/05/20/repeating_repeating_repeating~2304588/</guid><pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 21:07:53 +0200</pubDate><description>	&lt;p&gt;If you are in a chat room and someone has said something, then WHY would anyone need you to repeat it? Unless of course, you happen by a one in a BILLION chance to have had the same thought at the same time and then typed it at the same rate... And if you join a chat room, SCROLL UP to see what has already been said.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;And the same goes in the real world. Person A says something. Person B says something. Person C does not need to repeat what either of the former parties have just said.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/2007/05/20/repeating_repeating_repeating~2304588/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><comments>http://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/2007/05/20/repeating_repeating_repeating~2304588/#comments</comments></item><item><title>Cramming</title><link>http://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/2007/05/20/cramming~2304530/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:hannahborrett.blog.co.uk,2007-05-20:/2007/05/20/cramming~2304530/</guid><pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 20:59:24 +0200</pubDate><description>	&lt;p&gt;Why do people say it fries your brain? What am I more likely to remember, what I learnt twelve hours ago, or what I learnt twelve weeks ago? Screw long term revision, let the three day cramming sessions begin!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/2007/05/20/cramming~2304530/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><comments>http://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/2007/05/20/cramming~2304530/#comments</comments></item><item><title>Annoyances</title><link>http://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/2007/05/18/annoyances~2294764/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:hannahborrett.blog.co.uk,2007-05-18:/2007/05/18/annoyances~2294764/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 22:37:10 +0200</pubDate><description>	&lt;p&gt;Stop begging people to RATE your poems. If it's been ten minutes and no-one has, then it is obviously crap and no-one has the heart to tell you.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;And if YOUR grammar is crap too, then YOU have no right to rate other people's peoms.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/2007/05/18/annoyances~2294764/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><comments>http://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/2007/05/18/annoyances~2294764/#comments</comments></item></channel></rss>
