http://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/en-EUMokoFeed10http://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/http://data5.blog.de/design/preview/ea/6c2e297e1599514bad3c2dd013b0b5_160x200.jpghttp://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/2007/05/18/annoyances~2294764/#c3595857tag:hannahborrett.blog.co.uk,2007-05-22:/2007/05/18/annoyances~2294764/#c3595857Tue, 22 May 2007 16:44:19 +0200Oh I see, Thats a reasonable comment I suppose.<br> Apolagies.http://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/2007/05/18/annoyances~2294764/#c3595857http://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/2007/05/18/annoyances~2294764/#c3582642tag:hannahborrett.blog.co.uk,2007-05-20:/2007/05/18/annoyances~2294764/#c3582642Sun, 20 May 2007 21:04:13 +0200Paleindian, I meant that if someone's grammar is crap, then they have no right to tell other people that the grammar in their poem is crap. For example I don't think someone has the write to critisize a poem with a comment like this: "omg u loser, lyk u misd a ful stp in teh 1st stanza"<br> <br> I wasn't saying that bad grammar = bad poetry.http://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/2007/05/18/annoyances~2294764/#c3582642http://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/2007/05/18/annoyances~2294764/#c3570157tag:hannahborrett.blog.co.uk,2007-05-18:/2007/05/18/annoyances~2294764/#c3570157Fri, 18 May 2007 23:59:54 +0200Poems are not about grammer. Poems are an expression of oneself, an artform. I disagree with your statement.<br> Perhaps in some cases poems are intended to be read a certain way to illustrate a certain complexity that does not conform.http://hannahborrett.blog.co.uk/2007/05/18/annoyances~2294764/#c3570157