tag:hannahborrett.blog.co.uk,2009-11-11:/MokoFeed2009-11-11T15:24:39+01:00tag:hannahborrett.blog.co.uk,2007-05-22:/2007/05/18/annoyances~2294764/#c3595857pailindian2007-05-22T16:44:19+02:002007-05-22T16:44:19+02:00Oh I see, Thats a reasonable comment I suppose.<br> Apolagies.tag:hannahborrett.blog.co.uk,2007-05-20:/2007/05/18/annoyances~2294764/#c3582642cherryicecream2007-05-20T21:04:13+02:002007-05-20T21:04:13+02:00Paleindian, I meant that if someone's grammar is crap, then they have no right to tell other people that the grammar in their poem is crap. For example I don't think someone has the write to critisize a poem with a comment like this: "omg u loser, lyk u misd a ful stp in teh 1st stanza"<br> <br> I wasn't saying that bad grammar = bad poetry.tag:hannahborrett.blog.co.uk,2007-05-18:/2007/05/18/annoyances~2294764/#c3570157Paleindian2007-05-18T23:59:54+02:002007-05-18T23:59:54+02:00Poems are not about grammer. Poems are an expression of oneself, an artform. I disagree with your statement.<br> Perhaps in some cases poems are intended to be read a certain way to illustrate a certain complexity that does not conform.